|
The drop at Rowley Bottom was
approximately 135ft. This would conventionally have needed
22 locks of about 6ft drop each. Because this canal was
particularly short of water along the top level, the only
way to ensure there would be sufficient water to operate the
locks would have been to pump water from the bottom of the
flight back to the top. This would have been expensive in
machinery and fuel, so a cheaper option was sought. |
![]() |
|
The committee of the S.C.C. decided to
use 3 caisson locks instead of 22 conventional ones, but the
possibility of the caisson proving to be failure was, no
doubt, a major consideration in the planning. It was
probably the reason behind the decision to place these
caissons at Rowley Bottom so that if a lock flight should
have to be built later, it would be easy to back-pump
because the top and bottom locks would be close
together. |